How does MEFedMVVM compose the catalogs and how can I override the behavior? – MEFedMVVM Part 4

Some content may be out of date. See latest blog on changes made here.

Introduction

As you already know, MEFedMVVM is capable of composing the catalogs for you so that you do not have to worry about it both in Silverlight and in WPF. The composition happens a bit differently in SL and WPF so I will divide the “How to write a composer” section in 2, how it works for SL and how it works for WPF. But first let’s see what is common.

Please Note: This article is for advanced scenarios of using MEFedMVVM if you are using MEFedMVVM with its default behavior you do not need to do this since by default MEFedMVVM does the composition on its own. Yet if you want to have a silverlight app that uses multiple XAP files or a WPF app that is loading dlls that are not referenced by the main application and that reside somewhere else then the exe directory (or even Extensions folder of the base directory).

The LocatorBootstrapper and the IComposers

If you have been looking in the code of MEFedMVVM you’ll know that there is a class called LocatorBootstrapper. This class is responsible of checking if the MEF composition is done and if not I will ask the Composers to do so.

The “Composers” ? What the hell are these??

Basically these are instances of IComposer and there are 2 of these in the LocatorBootstrapper, one for DesignTime composition and one for Runtime. By default MEFedMVVM uses its own implementation of the IComposer which are DefaultRuntimeComposer and DefaultDesignTimeComposer but if you want to do something smarter (I will talk more on this later in the article) you can call the ApplyComposer method of the LocatorBootstrapper and inject a runtime composer that you implement. You must make sure to make this call before anything gets composed. A good place to do this is in the Application class constructor.

In the current version you cannot supply a DesignTime IComposer. I could have made the ApplyComposer API to accept another composer for DesignTime yet this method would be called always too late from Blend. I am currently working on a solution for this. Having said this, I do not see why you would want to override the default DesignTime composer since you still have control. I will talk more on this later in the post but any assembly marked with the DesignTimeCatalog will get picked up and loaded by the DefaultDesignTimeComposer. The only case where you would want to override this behavior is if you want to ignore the DesignTimeCatalog attribute. This is not suggested since not only it will slow down a lot the composition since blend loads many assemblies but it can also cause exceptions in Silverlight. I am open for suggestions so if you have any please let me know.

How can I create a Composer?

You do so by implementing the IComposer interface which looks like this.

   1: public interface IComposer

   2:     {

   3:         bool InitializeContainer();

   4:     }

In the InializeContainer you should put the code to initialize the Container and call CompositionHost.Initialize. (For WPF there is a catch that I will explain in the WPF section of the post).

Understanding and writing a Composer for Silverlight

What do the default MEFedMVVM composer do for SL?

The DesignTimeComposer will load all the assemblies that are decorated with the DesignTimeCatalog attribute in the AppDomain of Blend by using a trick explained here and create a CompositionContainer with MEF AssemblyCatalogs. So even if you have multiple XAP files MEFedMVVM will still get resolved as long as you put the DesignTimeCatalog attribute. If you forget to do this MEFedMVVM will put a message in the output window saying “No assemblies found for Design time. Quick tip… do not forget to put the DesignTimeCatalogAttribute for the assembly that contains your design time stuff. Even if its just a ViewModel you want to load.”. Yet in order to get this you need to have Blend attached with VisualStudio. (I am working hard on a solution to make this more obvious).

The Runtime Composer does not do anything. No really! It does not. The implementation simple returns true in the InitializeContainer method. This is because in SL CompositionInitializer.SatisfyImports (a class that is not present in WPF since WPF does not have System.ComponentModel.Composition.Initialization.dll) will create a container from the existing XAP.

So if you want to override the Runtime behavior for the SL version of MEFedMVVM you do not even have to call LocatorBootstrapper.ApplyComposer because for SL this is not doing anything anyway! But for the code to be the same for SL and WPF maybe its best if you do the call.

Quick Tip: If you are overriding the default container do not forget to add the an assembly catalog for the MEFedMVVM library, if you want to get injected with services that come out of the box with MEFedMVVM such as IVisualStateManager. Here is some sample code that is loading different XAP files

   1: AggregateCatalog aggregateCatalog = new AggregateCatalog();

   2: //add the catalogs for the current assembly and the MEFedMVVM assembly since we are overriding the default behavior

   3: aggregateCatalog.Catalogs.Add(new AssemblyCatalog(typeof(ViewModelLocator).Assembly));

   4: aggregateCatalog.Catalogs.Add(new AssemblyCatalog(typeof(App).Assembly));

   5: var listOfPluginXAPs = new[] { "Plugin1.xap" };

   6: foreach (var item in listOfPluginXAPs)

   7: {

   8:     DeploymentCatalog deploymentCatalog =

   9:       new DeploymentCatalog(item);

  10:  

  11:     aggregateCatalog.Catalogs.Add(deploymentCatalog);

  12:  

  13:     deploymentCatalog.DownloadCompleted += (s, args) =>

  14:     {

  15:         if (args.Error != null)

  16:             Debug.WriteLine("Error downloading plugin from " + item + " Exception: " + args.Error);

  17:         if (args.Cancelled)

  18:             Debug.WriteLine("Downloading of plugins was cancelled");

  19:  

  20:         PluginsDownloaded = true;

  21:     };

  22:  

  23:     deploymentCatalog.DownloadAsync();

  24: }

  25: CompositionHost.Initialize(aggregateCatalog);

Understanding and writing a Composer for WPF

What do the default MEFedMVVM composer do for WPF?

The DesignTimeComposer will load all the assemblies that are decorated with the DesignTimeCatalog attribute and create an AssemblyCatalog for each one. If you forget to put the DesignTimeCatalog attribute MEFedMVVM will put a message in the output window saying “No assemblies found for Design time. Quick tip… do not forget to put the DesignTimeCatalogAttribute for the assembly that contains your design time stuff. Even if its just a ViewModel you want to load.”. Yet in order to get this you need to have Blend attached with VisualStudio. (I am working hard on a solution to make this more obvious).

The RuntimeComposer will create a DirectoryCatalog for the AppDomain base directory and also checks if there is an Extensions folder and if so it will create a DirectoryCatalog for that folder as well. So yea if you have a set of plugins that are not being referenced by the main application, you do not even need to override the default behavior since you can make the plugins compile in an Extensions folder and MEFedMVVM will still load those assemblies. This is the code that creates the MEF catalog for the Default WPF Runtime Composer.

   1: var catalog = new AggregateCatalog();

   2: var baseDirectory = AppDomain.CurrentDomain.BaseDirectory;

   3: var extensionPath = String.Format(@"{0}\Extensions\", baseDirectory);

   4: catalog.Catalogs.Add(new DirectoryCatalog(baseDirectory));

   5: catalog.Catalogs.Add(new DirectoryCatalog(baseDirectory, "*.exe"));

   6: if (Directory.Exists(extensionPath))

   7:     catalog.Catalogs.Add(new DirectoryCatalog(extensionPath));

   8: return catalog;

The “catch” with WPF version of MEFedMVVM

WPF does not have System.ComponentModel.Composition.Inialization so as such it does not have CompositionHost and CompositionInitializer but Mr.MEF, Glenn Block created this dll for us over here, and we are using it in MEFedMVVM, thus we benefit from the same code for SL and WPF. The only difference is that you have to do a trick when creating the CompositionContainer. You need to specify the ExportFactoryProvider when creating the CompositionContainer. like so

   1: var provider = new ExportFactoryProvider();

   2: var container = new CompositionContainer(catalog, provider);

   3: provider.SourceProvider = container;

   4: CompositionHost.Initialize(container);

If you fail to do so MEFedMVVM will not resolve the ViewModels and the Services since MEFedMVVM using ExportFactory to get the imports.

Enough talking (well as such its blogging 🙂 ) give us some code!

I did 2 samples one for Silverlight by using DeploymentCatalog to load assemblies from different xap files and one for WPF using DirectoryCatalog to load plugins from a folder called Plugins (this was just to show how you can do it because as such I could made the plugins compile in a Directory called Extensions and it would still have worked).

The source can be found in by download the code from http://mefedmvvm.codeplex.com/SourceControl/list/changesets there is a folder samples where you will find these 2 samples.

Conclusion

As you can see MEFedMVVM can also be used in more advanced scenarios where you want control over the MEF Composition of Catalogs. The default composition will work for most of the apps, yet for some (such as multiple XAP SL applications) you must have control over the composition.

As always feedback is much appreciated.

Download MEFedMVVM and start MEFing it up!

http://mefedmvvm.codeplex.com/

Advertisements

IContextAware services to bridge the gap between the View and the ViewModel – MEFedMVVM Part 3

Some content may be out of date. See latest blog on changes made here.

If you did not have look at MEFedMVVM introduction please so here. I also wrote an article on ExportViewModel here.

So what the hell is an IContextAwareService??

It is a service that knows about its context (which is the UIElement that invoked the import for the ViewModel and the services it depends on).

As I said in previous posts this is one of my favorite feature that MEFedMVVM has. Why well many times I created attached properties to extend UI functionality so that I can do proper MVVM. Yet some times it does not feel right because there is still a gap. The ViewModel does not have control over what the attached property does. Usually this is solved by exposing commands from the ViewModel and then you have another attached property that invokes the command which is magically databound ad what not. An example of something like this is VSM support I did a while ago here.

Enter MEFedMVVM with it’s IContextAwareServices.

You create this kind of service when you want to do some thing to or with the UI Element using the ViewModel as its DataContext. For example let’s say I want to know when the UIElement is Loaded and Unloaded so that my ViewModel does something smart only when you are Loading and Unloading. (please note this is just one example and I choose this example just to show the technique)

So let’s start by creating a service to do this.

First thing we have to do is create a class that Implements IContextAware. So our class will look like this

   1: public class DefaultContainerStatus : IContainerStatus


   2: {


   3:    #region IContextAware Members


   4:


   5:    public void InjectContext(object context)


   6:    {


   7:    }


   8: }

As you can see this interface has a method called InjectContext. This method will be called by MEFedMVVM with the UIElement that is requesting the ViewModel that has this service as Dependency. Since now we have the instance to the UIElement we can hook to the Loaded and Unloaded event and raise our own events that can later be mocked when unit testing the ViewModel.

So let’s create an interface to hide the default implementation of our service

   1: public interface IContainerStatus : IContextAware


   2: {


   3:     event Action ContainerLoaded;


   4:     event Action ContainerUnloaded;


   5: }

and now make the service implement that interface

   1: [ExportService(ServiceType.Both, typeof(IContainerStatus))]


   2: public class DefaultContainerStatus : IContainerStatus


   3: {


   4:     #region IContainerStatus Members


   5:


   6:     public event Action ContainerLoaded;


   7:


   8:     public event Action ContainerUnloaded;


   9:


  10:     #endregion


  11:


  12:     #region IContextAware Members


  13:


  14:     public void InjectContext(object context)


  15:     {


  16:         var element = context as FrameworkElement;


  17:         if (element != null)


  18:         {


  19:             element.Loaded += new RoutedEventHandler(ElementLoaded);


  20:             element.Unloaded += new RoutedEventHandler(ElementUnloaded);


  21:         }


  22:     }


  23:


  24:     void ElementLoaded(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e)


  25:     {


  26:         if (ContainerLoaded != null)


  27:             ContainerLoaded();


  28:     }


  29:


  30:     void ElementUnloaded(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e)


  31:     {


  32:         if (ContainerUnloaded != null)


  33:             ContainerUnloaded();


  34:     }


  35:


  36:     #endregion


  37: }

As you can see here all I am doing is handle the Loading and Unloading of the UIElement and raise the IContainerStatus events. In the code about I am also Exporting the service by using the ExportService attribute which tells MEFedMVVM that this is a service that can be consumed by ViewModels.

And that’s it folks. We are done. Now a ViewModel can start using this service by simple requesting it from the ExportViewModel attribute like so

   1: [ExportViewModel("VM1", typeof(IContainerStatus)]


   2: public class TestViewModel : BaseViewModel

One thing you should not forget is putting the [assembly: DesignTimeCatalog] somewhere in your project, otherwise MEFedMVVM will ignore your project. This is something that is not used at runtime but for design time it is crutial so that MEFedMVVM only loads your projects. MEFedMVVM will ignore any assembly at design time that does not have this attribute set!

Conclusion

There is a lot of potential in this approach. Currently MEFedMVVM exposes some out of the box IContextAware services which are

IViewStateManager – You can use this to invoke Visual States from your ViewModel.

IDispatcher – You can use this service to invoke delegates on the UI thread

IContainerStatus – You can use this service to get loaded and unloaded events.

and many more are coming up. But hey build your own if MEFedMVVM does not give you one already, it’s easy 🙂 and yea we would love to see what you come up with, if you want to contribute we are always happy to have your code 🙂

As always feedback is most appreciated.

Go MEF it up now 🙂 http://mefedmvvm.codeplex.com/

Leveraging MEFedMVVM ExportViewModel – MEFedMVVM Part 2

Some content may be out of date. See latest blog on changes made here.

In this post I will explain and show case what you can do with your VieModel by leveraging MEFedMVVM. If you want an introduction to MEFedMVVM please go here.

In order to make your ViewModel discoverable you simple decorate the ViewModel with ExportViewModel and give your view model a name so that the View can import the ViewModel by name. Some thing like this

ViewModel

   1: [ExportViewModel("VM1")]

   2: public class MyViewModel

and the view can look for this view model like this

   1: <UserControl x:Class="MEFedMVVMDemo.Views.UsersScreen"

   2:              xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml/presentation"

   3:              xmlns:x="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml"

   4:              xmlns:meffed="http:\\www.codeplex.com\MEFedMVVM"

   5:              meffed:ViewModelLocator.ViewModel="VM1">

The ViewModelLocator.ViewModel will leverage MEF to go get the exported ViewModel and set an instance of that ViewModel as the UserControl’s DataContext. BUT there is more stuff you can do.

 

DesignTime Data

The best way how to have design time data is by having Data Services injected in the ViewModel so that at design time you inject design time services and at runtime you inject the real services. This also allows you to better unit test because you can mock the data services while unit testing.

MEFedMVVM allows you to easily export services so that you can then import these services in the ViewModel. When you are exporting the service you also supply MetaData which is used by MEFedMVVM to decide which service to inject. Let’s do a quick example. Let’s say your ViewModel is using a service that implements IUserService to get a list of user from a database at runtime and you create another implementation of this service for design time that just returns a static list of Users. you would export these services like this

Design time Service

   1: [ExportService(ServiceType.DesignTime, typeof(IUsersService))]

   2: public class DesignTimeUsersService : IUsersService

   3: {

   4:    #region IUsersService Members

   5:  

   6:    public IList<Models.User> GetAllUsers(){}

   7: }

Runtime Service

   1: [ExportService(ServiceType.Runtime, typeof(IUsersService))]

   2: public class UsersService : IUsersService

   3: {

   4:    #region IUsersService Members

   5:  

   6:    public IList<Models.User> GetAllUsers()

   7: }

As you can see all you do is decorate the service with the Export Service attribute and specify if its Runtime or DesignTime. You can also specify ServiceType.Both if you want that service to be injected both at runtime and design time. I will talk more on the Export Service and what you can do with it in my next post. Just to give you a quick insight of what this can do here is a small list

– Have shared services (a service that is shared for all ViewModels)

– Have prioritized Services (have a service priority and MEFedMVVM will pick the appropriate service to be injected)

– Have IContextAware services. These are special UI related services. Basically MEFedMVVM will call InjectContext passing the UI element that requested the ViewModel, so that service can work as a bridge for the ViewModel and the View without any coupling. (This is one of my favorite features)

OK let’s not get side tracked. Were are we?

We have a ViewModel that is an empty class decorated with ExportViewModel and we have two services exported one for runtime and one for design time.

In order to inject the services we need in our ViewModel, we need to state that in the ExportViewModel attribute, like this

   1: [ExportViewModel("VM1", typeof(IUsersService))]

   2: public class TestViewModel {}

This will tell MEFedMVVM to get that service and inject it to the ViewModel. But how can MEFedMVVM inject this in the ViewModel? Well in order to do so your ViewModel must implement an interface called IServiceConsumer. Here is the interface contract.

   1: /// <summary>

   2: /// Defines a service consumer.

   3: /// An entity that has a Service Locator and consumes services

   4: /// </summary>

   5: public interface IServiceConsumer

   6: {

   7:     /// <summary>

   8:     /// Gets the service locator that contains the services 

   9:     /// </summary>

  10:     IServiceLocator ServiceLocator { get; }

  11:     

  12:     /// <summary>

  13:     /// Call to be made when services are injected to the ServiceLocator

  14:     /// </summary>

  15:     void OnServicesInjected();

  16: }

So you will have a ServiceLocator property from where you can get the Services injected from and you need a method called OnServicesInjected which will be called when MEFedMVVM injects the services.

Don’t worry if you do not want to implement the interface yourself we made the heavy lifting for you. You can inherit from BaseViewModel which implements this interface for you. BaseViewModel also implements the INotifyPropertyChanged so you can do PropertyChanged notifications by calling OnPropertyChanged( () => Myproperty); Yes the implementation of INotifyPropertyChanged we used leverages lambdas so that you do not have spelling mistakes when doing property changed notifications 🙂

Back to service injection…. So our ViewModel is not implementing IServiceConsumer or inheriting BaseViewModel; inside the OnServicesInjected you can get the services and get the data you need. Like this

   1: protected override void OnServicesInjectedOverride()

   2: {

   3:     foreach (var item in GetService<IUsersService>().GetAllUsers())

   4:     {

   5:         if (SelectedUser == null)

   6:             SelectedUser = item;

   7:         users.Add(item);

   8:     }

   9: }

So here I am getting the data from the IUsersService that was injected and adding them in a collection which is bound in the View.

So yea finally my designer can see this in Blend

image

This sounded like a lot of work because I went into details of how everything works. But try it and you’ll see how easy it is to do. If its not easy enough get back to me and I really want to hear your feedback.

What if I do not have a service injected but I still want design time data??

Yes, I agree. There are some ViewModels that do not have a service injected BUT they still want design time data. An example of this… Let’s say you have another ViewModel which renders the SelectedUser which the end user selects from the other ViewModel. This ViewModel does not have a service because the data is coming from either from a Mediator callback or from a Property that is bound to some UI…. How can I have Design time data for this ViewModel?

MEFedMVVM let’s you do this as well. All you need to do is implement the IDesignTimeAware. This is the interface

   1: /// <summary>

   2: /// Interface to be implemented by ViewModels that want to do something when rendering in design time

   3: /// </summary>

   4: public interface IDesignTimeAware

   5: {

   6:     void DesignTimeInitialization();

   7: }

The DesignTimeInitialization method will be called on your ViewModel (ONLY AT DESIGN TIME) and inside there you can do what you want in order to have Design Time Data. Here is an example

   1: [ExportViewModel("VM2", typeof(IMediator), typeof(IVisualStateManager))]

   2: public class SelectedUserViewModel : BaseViewModel, IDesignTimeAware

   3: {

   4:     private User selectedUser;

   5:  

   6:     /// <summary>

   7:     /// Gets or sets the selected user

   8:     /// </summary>

   9:     public User SelectedUser

  10:     {

  11:         get { return selectedUser; }

  12:         set

  13:         {

  14:             selectedUser = value;

  15:             OnPropertyChanged(() => SelectedUser);

  16:         }

  17:     }

  18:  

  19:     protected override void OnServicesInjectedOverride()

  20:     {

  21:         mediator = GetService<IMediator>();

  22:         if (mediator != null)

  23:             mediator.Register(this);

  24:     }

  25:  

  26:     [MediatorMessageSink(MediatorMessages.SelectedUser, ParameterType=typeof(User))]

  27:     public void OnSelectedUserChanged(User selectedUser)

  28:     {

  29:         SelectedUser = selectedUser;

  30:     }

  31:  

  32:  

  33:     #region IDataContextAware Members

  34:  

  35:     public void DesignTimeInitialization()

  36:     {

  37:         SelectedUser = new User

  38:         {

  39:             Name = "Marlon", Surname = "Grech", Age = 24

  40:         };

  41:     }

  42:  

  43:     #endregion

  44: }

This will render like this in Blend

image

What if the DataContext is set because I am in a DataTemplate? How can I get Services injected and some design time data as well?

Very well. Sometimes we have scenarios when you have a DataTemplate that has a UserControl inside. This UserControl will still have a ViewModel set as its DataContext but it must not be set from MEFedMVVM ViewModelLocator.ViewModel attached property since the ContentControl or the ItemsControl should be setting the DataContext.

You can still do this with MEFedMVVM! In the ExportService you can have an additional parameter stating that this ViewModel should be “DataContextAware”. Something like this

   1: [ExportViewModel("UserVM", true, typeof(IMediator))]

   2: public class UserViewModel : BaseViewModel, IDesignTimeAware

   3: {

The second parameter passed set to true is where you specify that this ViewModel needs to be “DataContextAware”.

What is this gonna do?

Well at Runtime it will not create an instance of the ViewModel, instead it will wait until the DataContext is set on the UIElement. When DataContext is set, it will inject the services that you requested in the ExportViewModel.

At DesignTime it will create the ViewModel instance and inject it in the DataContext of the UI element so that you can still design your UI seamlessly.

Conclusion

These are only some of the features that MEFedMVVM has to offer. We are working on expanding more functionality. We are also working hard to test as many scenarios as possible but without your feedback and help we cannot cover all of them.

Please let us know if you encounter any issues so that together we can continue building an awesome and easy to use library, and have loads of fun creating cool WPF and SL applications 🙂

Download the source

http://mefedmvvm.codeplex.com/

Peace

An introduction to MEFedMVVM – PART 1

Some content may be out of date. See latest blog on changes made here.

Intro

This is a small introduction to MEFedMVVM, a library that I built with the help of some fellow WPF Disciples, Peter O’Hanlon and Glenn Block (aka Mr.MEF). This library will enable you to quickly create ViewModels that consume services and inject these ViewModels in your View’s DataContext. It will also enable you to work better with your fellow friend, “The Designer” by leveraging Design time data and many other UI friendly stuff. With this library you can create WPF/Silverlight applications seamlessly since the API is common for both WPF and Silverlight.

This framework works for SL 4, WPF (.NET4.0 ). And we only support Blend 4 RC or newer. MEFedMVVM does not work in Blend 4 Beta .

MEFedMVVM-Logo2

Goals

– Write code that works for SL and WPF.

– Enable Design time data.

– Enable loosely coupled bridge between View and ViewModel.

– Enable easy ViewModel discovery and injection mechanism.

– Make composition super easy by leveraging MEF capabilities (without coupling your code with MEF).

How do I use this thing?

Ok so these are the first 3 basic steps.

1. Add a reference to MEFedMVVM.WPF/MEFedMVVM.SL (you also have to add a reference to dlls that are located in the Dependencies folder of the Source code if you are not including the library source code in your solution.)

image

2. Add an attribute somewhere in your project to mark the assembly as a “MEFedMVVM” Assembly, [assembly: DesignTimeCatalogAttribute]. This is used so that MEFedMVVM only looks for exported items in the marked assemblies. This makes initialization faster.

Now begins the MEFedMVVM fun….

3. Make your ViewModel discoverable by decorating it with [ExportViewModel(“MyMEFedViewModel”)] and instruct the view to go find that ViewModel by setting an attached property meffed:ViewModelLocator.ViewModel="MyMEFedViewModel"

So the View looks like this

   1: <UserControl x:Class="MEFedMVVMDemo.Views.UsersScreen"


   2:              xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml/presentation"


   3:              xmlns:x="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml"


   4:              xmlns:meffed="http:\\www.codeplex.com\MEFedMVVM"


   5:              meffed:ViewModelLocator.ViewModel="MyMEFedViewModel">

and the ViewModel like this

   1: [ExportViewModel("MyMEFedViewModel")]


   2: public class TestViewModel { }

and viola that is it…. You run the project and magically the ViewModel gets injected in the View…

I must say, I cannot take the credit for this magic, it’s all powered by the mighty MEF!

Ok so we injected the ViewModel in the View, but where the hell is the Design time data???

well should I tell you or should I go to sleep ? mmmm…. thinking… still thinking… aa well might as well tell you now that I started right 😛

When creating ViewModels usually the data is coming from some service which is injected to the VM via Dependency injection. What MEFedMVVM will do for you is let you expose services and include meta data that gives extra information to the service. MEFedMVVM uses this Meta data to decide which service to give to the VM at runtime and which service to inject at Design time.

This is how you expose services (for runtime)

   1: [ExportService(ServiceType.Runtime, typeof(IUsersService))]


   2: public class UsersService : IUsersService

This is how you expose services (for design time)

   1: [ExportService(ServiceType.DesignTime, typeof(IUsersService))]


   2: public class DesignTimeUsersService : IUsersService

P.S you can also specify ServiceType.Both if you want the same service to be injected at runtime and design time.

Once you make your Services discoverable it’s time to start using them in your ViewModel. In order to do this, you must have your VM implement the IServiceConsumer interface, or if you are lazy like me just inherit from BaseViewModel. You also need to specify which services you want injected by specifying the different types in the ExportViewModel attribute. Something like this

   1: [ExportViewModel("VM1", typeof(IUsersService), typeof(IVisualStateManager), typeof(IDispatcherService))]


   2: public class TestViewModel : BaseViewModel

In the above code I am importing the IUserService, the IVisualStateManager and the IDispatcher service into my view model. These services are injected when MEFedMVVM creates an instance of the ViewModel into a ServiceLocator so you can get them by calling GetService<T>() from the OnServicesInjected method. the code for this looks something like this

   1: protected override void OnServicesInjectedOverride()


   2: {


   3:     var usersService = GetService<IUsersService>();


   4:     var dispatcherService = GetService<IDispatcherService>();


   5: }

You might ask yourself why can’t I just import the services by using a standard [Import] like in normal MEF. Basically when the MEFedMVVM is looking for the correct services it is also doing some extra stuff that I will talk about in following blog posts (but I know you are curious so I’ll give you a hint…. IVisualStateManager for example gets injected with the UIElement that is requesting the ViewModel so that then the ViewModel can execute state without coupling to the VSM)

What comes out of the box?

Out of the box this library supplies a number of things… here is a list of most of the stuff

Common Services

– IMediator (use this to communicate from one ViewModel to another.

– IViewStateManager (User this to invoke VisualStates from the ViewModel)

– IContainerStatus (Provides a loaded event and unloaded event, these are hooked to the loaded and unloaded events of the UIElement that is consuming the ViewModel)

– IDispatcher (Provides a way so that you can call BeginInvoke on the Dispatcher in a loosely coupled way so that you can mock this when doing unit tests)

– and many many many more to come….

– and many more you can create yourself.

Basically this library is still learning how to walk, its still a cute little baby… but the basics are in (so yea its a healthy cute baby)… I will talk more on how you can create your own services that BRIDGE the ViewModel and the View in my next post (yet yea I know, I know, you are curious… Implement IContextAware in your service and you get injected with the View that requested the ViewModel and then you can do what the hell you want :). but don’t tell anyone I told you 😛 )

Other stuff

DelegateCommand<T> (Used to create commands without having to create a separate class that implements ICommand)

BaseViewModel (Implement INotifyPropertyChanged and you can raise PropertyChanged notifications in a strongly typed manner i.e OnPropertyChanged(() => Users); . BaseViewModel also has some other benifits that I will discuss in my next post)

More stuff coming up … don’t don’t worry … we just built the basics here 🙂

Conclusion

Why do I think this library has a lot of potential? Well right now there are some things missing but the basics are there and it is really easy to add new stuff now that we have a solid base. There are loads of things that I did not mention in this post since I wanted this post to be just a mini introduction. I will have Part 2,3 n of this post coming up shortly where I will go into more dept of the library and how you can extend it and bend it to your will.

I suggest you download the code from CodePlex and start playing with it. Right now I really need your help and get as much feedback / bug reports as possible … WARNING: Right now I am doing loads of changes to the code so please do not use this in production projects.

I hope you like this new library… just a word of caution when using this library…. it can get really addictive 😛 myself am suffering this side effect right now … hehe 🙂

Part 2 here

Part 3 here

Part 4 here

Download source and MEF it up! http://mefedmvvm.codeplex.com/

Working with the WPF VSM in an MVVM friendly manner

Lately I have been working a lot with Silverlight. While working on my first Silverlight project I encountered my first problem… There are no Triggers in SL!!! At first I was frustrated and started hitting my self in the head but hey SL is not that bad… SL has the Visual State Manager aka VSM which is a pretty awesome tool I must say. I still think SL should have Triggers for some tasks such as ControlTemplates and other tasks yet with VSM you can still get some cool stuff done 🙂

What really strikes me with the VSM is the way it is supported in Blend, and YES designers love VSM! With the VSM they can define states in an easy way (and yes these states transition and the designer has full control on the transitions done). They can navigate easily through states in Blend and even see the transitions being done in Blend there and then.

image

Going back to WPF one thing that is missing in WPF is a way how a designer can define animations that get Triggered when something happens… Or let me re phrase that…. There is no easy way, or better not as easy as the VSM 🙂

Triggers in WPF can invoke Storyboards yet still it feels like the WPF animation system does not have a nice way to dispatch animations… Enter the VSM for WPF.

Yes, VSM is available for WPF as well, and yes it is supported in Blend (you just have to do a little trick that you can find over here)

I created a sample project that leverages the VSM for its animations and yes its all MVVM (in the sample app you’ll see that I am also using design time data for blend and I also included a mini MVVM Libarary that I use to develop my everyday WPF projects 🙂 ).

 

Let’s Get Started

So let’s start by defining a state in Blend. In order to do so (assuming you followed the instructions to enable the VSM for WPF projects) you need to navigate to the States Tab and create a new state. Once the state is created and selected you’ll see that Blend will go to recording mode (just like it does when you are doing a normal WPF animation). Now you can change any property of any element and the Blend will record that and create the appropriate transitions for it.

image

Ok, now that we have the states defined in Blend what is next? well we need a way how to invoke these states for starters!

The Blend team were so kind to give us a Behavior called GoToStateAction. This behavior will basically invoke a state when an event is raised, for example if you have a button that should dispatch a new state, you simple find the GoToStateAction form the Asset tab and drag it on the button

image

Then you can set the properties for this behavior in the properties tab. There you can specify which state to select.

image

By doing these steps (define a state and use the GoToStateAction to invoke the state) you are already good to go. You can press F5 and you can see that when you click the button you get transitioned from one state to another. (P.S it’s important that you set a default transition time span otherwise you end up with no transition since the default is 0s).

 

This is all cool but what about MVVM ??

I hear you I hear you…. What if I have a ViewModel which needs to invoke a state change ?? Unfortunately this is not so straight forward… BUT of course there is a solution… I extended the GoToStateAction so that it can be hooked up from a ViewModel. Here is my extended version

   1: public class VisualStateManagerInvoker : GoToStateAction

   2: {

   3:     #region CurrentState

   4:  

   5:     /// <summary>

   6:     /// CurrentState Attached Dependency Property

   7:     /// </summary>

   8:     public static readonly DependencyProperty CurrentStateProperty =

   9:         DependencyProperty.RegisterAttached("CurrentState", typeof(string), typeof(VisualStateManagerInvoker),

  10:                                             new PropertyMetadata((string)null,

  11:                                                                  new PropertyChangedCallback(OnCurrentStateChanged)));

  12:  

  13:     /// <summary>

  14:     /// Gets the CurrentState property.  This dependency property 

  15:     /// indicates ....

  16:     /// </summary>

  17:     public static string GetCurrentState(DependencyObject d)

  18:     {

  19:         return (string)d.GetValue(CurrentStateProperty);

  20:     }

  21:  

  22:     /// <summary>

  23:     /// Sets the CurrentState property.  This dependency property 

  24:     /// indicates ....

  25:     /// </summary>

  26:     public static void SetCurrentState(DependencyObject d, string value)

  27:     {

  28:         d.SetValue(CurrentStateProperty, value);

  29:     }

  30:  

  31:     /// <summary>

  32:     /// Handles changes to the CurrentState property.

  33:     /// </summary>

  34:     private static void OnCurrentStateChanged(DependencyObject d, DependencyPropertyChangedEventArgs e)

  35:     {

  36:         if (GetGoToStateAction(d) == null)

  37:         {

  38:             var command = new RelayCommand(x => //where x is the state name passed as parameter

  39:             {

  40:                 var stateAction = new VisualStateManagerInvoker();

  41:                 stateAction.Attach(d);

  42:                 stateAction.UseTransitions = GetShouldUseTransition(d);

  43:                 stateAction.StateName = (string)x;

  44:                 stateAction.Invoke(null);

  45:             });

  46:             SetGoToStateAction(d, command);

  47:         }

  48:     }

  49:  

  50:     #endregion

  51:  

  52:     #region GoToStateAction

  53:  

  54:     /// <summary>

  55:     /// GoToStateAction Attached Dependency Property

  56:     /// </summary>

  57:     public static readonly DependencyProperty GoToStateActionProperty =

  58:         DependencyProperty.RegisterAttached("GoToStateAction", typeof(ICommand), typeof(VisualStateManagerInvoker),

  59:                                             new PropertyMetadata((ICommand)null));

  60:  

  61:     /// <summary>

  62:     /// Gets the GoToStateAction property.  This dependency property 

  63:     /// indicates ....

  64:     /// </summary>

  65:     public static ICommand GetGoToStateAction(DependencyObject d)

  66:     {

  67:         return (ICommand)d.GetValue(GoToStateActionProperty);

  68:     }

  69:  

  70:     /// <summary>

  71:     /// Sets the GoToStateAction property.  This dependency property 

  72:     /// indicates ....

  73:     /// </summary>

  74:     public static void SetGoToStateAction(DependencyObject d, ICommand value)

  75:     {

  76:         d.SetValue(GoToStateActionProperty, value);

  77:     }

  78:  

  79:     #endregion

  80:  

  81:     #region ShouldUseTransition

  82:  

  83:     /// <summary>

  84:     /// ShouldUseTransition Attached Dependency Property

  85:     /// </summary>

  86:     public static readonly DependencyProperty ShouldUseTransitionProperty =

  87:         DependencyProperty.RegisterAttached("ShouldUseTransition", typeof(bool), typeof(VisualStateManagerInvoker),

  88:                                             new PropertyMetadata((bool)true));

  89:  

  90:     /// <summary>

  91:     /// Gets the ShouldUseTransition property.  This dependency property 

  92:     /// indicates ....

  93:     /// </summary>

  94:     public static bool GetShouldUseTransition(DependencyObject d)

  95:     {

  96:         return (bool)d.GetValue(ShouldUseTransitionProperty);

  97:     }

  98:  

  99:     /// <summary>

 100:     /// Sets the ShouldUseTransition property.  This dependency property 

 101:     /// indicates ....

 102:     /// </summary>

 103:     public static void SetShouldUseTransition(DependencyObject d, bool value)

 104:     {

 105:         d.SetValue(ShouldUseTransitionProperty, value);

 106:     }

 107:  

 108:     #endregion

 109:  

 110: }

This class contains 2 attached properties CurrentState (which is a string) and a GoToStateAction which is an ICommand (It also has another property ShouldUseTransition which instructs the VSM weather to use transitions or just change the properties for the new state).

The CurrentState property will attach itself to the DepenedencyObject which is being decorated with this property and hook to its VSM (please note that the attach will crawl up the Logical Tree to find the first available VSM). This operation creates an RelayCommand that is set in the GoToStateAction attached property.

Now the interesting part happens. I created a base class for ViewModels that want to invoke states called StateBaseViewModel. Here is the code…

   1: /// <summary>

   2: /// Base view model that has a property for state changes

   3: /// </summary>

   4: public class StateBaseViewModel : BaseViewModel

   5: {

   6:     private string currentState;

   7:  

   8:     /// <summary>

   9:     /// Gets or sets the current state of the ViewModel

  10:     /// </summary>

  11:     public string CurrentState

  12:     {

  13:         get { return currentState; }

  14:         set

  15:         {

  16:             currentState = value;

  17:             RaisePropertyChanged("CurrentState");

  18:         }

  19:     }

  20:  

  21:     /// <summary>

  22:     /// Changes the CurrentState property to the spcified state

  23:     /// </summary>

  24:     public ICommand GoToStateCommand { get; protected set; }

  25:  

  26:  

  27:     /// <summary>

  28:     /// Specify a command to be fired when state changes

  29:     /// </summary>

  30:     public ICommand OnGoToState { get; set; }

  31:  

  32:  

  33:     public StateBaseViewModel()

  34:     {

  35:         GoToStateCommand = new RelayCommand(

  36:             x =>

  37:             {

  38:                 CurrentState = (string)x;

  39:                 if (OnGoToState != null && OnGoToState.CanExecute(CurrentState))

  40:                     OnGoToState.Execute(CurrentState);

  41:             },

  42:             x => !String.IsNullOrEmpty((string)x)

  43:             );

  44:     }

  45: }

This base view model has the same 2 properties of the VisualStateManagerInvoker. We can make these 2 in sync together by using standard TwoWay databinding. By doing so the VisualStateManagerInvoker will feed the View Model with a command that is hooked up to a UI element VSM and when invoked this will ask the VSM for that element to transition to the state passed as parameter.

Here is the binding for this

   1: <local:Checkout  

   2:     mvvmStateManagement:VisualStateManagerInvoker.CurrentState="{Binding CurrentState}"

   3:     mvvmStateManagement:VisualStateManagerInvoker.GoToStateAction="{Binding OnGoToState, Mode=TwoWay}" />

Assuming that the element local:Checkout has a datacontext set to a view model that is inheriting from StateBaseViewModel, you can see how the VisualStateManagerInvoker is feeding this View model a GoToStateAction by simple two way databinding.

Since this command is now ready to be used from our ViewModel we can invoke a state by simple executing the command like so.

   1: CancelCommand = new RelayCommand(x =>

   2:                 {

   3:                     GoToStateCommand.Execute("CancelState");

   4:                 });

This is super awesome isn’t it 🙂

Another cool thing about this is that you can use this trick so that you can invoke a state from a child to its parent. Lets say that you have a Window that contains a usercontrol (which has a StateBaseViewModel set as its datacontext) and a button. You want the button to show the UserControl. Ok easy Just drag and drop a GoToStateAction behavior and set its state to the state which makes the user control visible. But now lets say you have a button inside the user control and this button needs to invoke a state defined in the Window. The VSM works with namescopes thus you cannot invoke a state that is out of your namescope. BUT with the approach of uses VisualStateManagerInvoker we can do this since we can set the binding in the same XAML line that declares the usercontrol in the Window thus being in the same namescope as the Window 🙂 We can then make a normal command that executes the GoToStateCommand in out StateBaseViewModel (this example is in the sample application to Cancel the check out of the shopping list and to show the thank you message when someone checks out the shopping cart)

Please note that the same code works for Silverlight.

Conclusion

I think that by using VSM one makes the Developer Designer workflow a happier thing. Designers love VSM and I learnt to love it as well. Now that I can invoke states easily from my ViewModel. Besides that since the implementation gets the VSM instance in an attached behavior and then feeds it to the ViewModel via databinding, the ViewModel never touches the VSM thus unit testing is much easier like this.

I found this way of working with the VSM awesome… OK I still need to make it cooler but as it is right now you can just grab the code and start working without any problems…. hope it helps 😀

 

Download sample application (P.S Open this in Blend 3 to get maximum pleasure 🙂 )

(Sample application contains MVVMHelper a small library I built for MVVM. It contains loads of goodies… have a look and enjoy)

Blend 3 and Sketchflow

Blend 3 and SketchFlow are out and let me tell you they ROCK…. here are some good links on this subject

Behaviors
http://electricbeach.org/?p=171

List of Behaviors from the Expression Blend website
http://gallery.expression.microsoft.com/en-us/site/search?f[0].Type=RootCategory&f[0].Value=behaviors

Demo of Blend 3 and SketchFlow
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-gb/ee341352.aspx

Videos on Sketchflow
http://www.microsoft.com/belux/MSDN/nl/chopsticks/default.aspx?id=1325

Blend 3 list of new features
http://blogs.msdn.com/expression/archive/2009/07/12/overview-of-new-features-in-expression-blend-3-sketchflow-part-iii.aspx
http://geekswithblogs.net/tkokke/archive/2009/07/10/9-little-new-things-in-expression-blend-3.aspx

How can I get the DataGrid control for Silverlight 2 Beta 1 to show up in Blend?

So, let me start by saying this, I am not a blend guru. I never use blend, I prefer Visual Studio. I was showing off Blend 2.5 March 2008 Preview to the designers at work and I noticed that the Silverlight DataGrid was not showing up in the list of controls in blend. Then I remembered that the Datagrid control for Silverlight 2 Beta 1 is in the System.Windows.Controls.Data dll which is not added as a reference by default in Silverlight projects.

So how can one make the Datagrid control show up in blend for a Silverlight project?

The answer is very easy. You have to add a reference to the System.Windows.Controls.Data dll. To do this right click on the References folder in blend and select Add Reference (as shown in the image below)

An open file dialog should pop up. The System.Windows.Controls.Data dll is located in the folder C:\Program Files\Microsoft SDKs\Silverlight\v2.0\Libraries\Client\. Enter that path in the address bar and a list of Dll should popup. Select the System.Windows.Controls.Data dll and you’re done 🙂

Now that you added the reference to the System.Windows.Controls.Data dll, the Datagrid control should appear in blend.

If you are going to use the DataGrid control for Silverlight I would suggest that you read this very useful blog post

Have loads of fun with Silverlight…